GERMAN ACADEMY OF SCIENCES
GERMAN ACADEMY OF SCIENCES
SCIENTIFICALLY INTRODUCING UNIVERSALITY TO ACADEMIC LIFE
   Faculties:   Music & Musicology · Philosophy · Medical Sciences · Education · Pythagoras · Consciousness · Humanities · Natural Science · The Dragon · The Veda · Culture · Opera & Arts
. . .Deutsche Übersetzung in Arbeit

 


Home

Site Map

Grundgesetz der Akademie

The Cosmic
Education Program

Introduction

Academic Institutes

Peter Hübner
Developer of the University

 

Faculty of
MUSIC & MUSICOLOGY
Theoretical Fundamentals

UNIVERSAL
MUSIC THEORY 2

XI.
INDIRECT AND DIRECT
GAINING KNOWLEDGE
IN MUSIC

Ancient Truths in Music

The Golden Net of
Knowledge in Music

The Great Musical
Sense of Achievement

The Organs of Cognition in the Process of Gaining
Knowledge in Music

Necessity of the
Neurophysiological
Integration

The Performance of the
Self-Awareness in the
Musical Process of
Knowing

The Self-Awareness
Systematically Practises
Self-Identification

Insight into the Basis
of Music

Fundamentals of
Modern Musicology

Limitations of Conventional
Musical Education

Increase of Performance
of the Intellect in Music

The Eigenfunction of
the Intellect as the
True Musical Creator

The Journey to the Eternal Sources of Music

The Highest Intellectual
Achievement
Possible to Man

Authentic Successful
Musicology

The Music Listener
at the Origin of All
Creative Thinking

Purposeful Development
of Performance in the
Field of our
Neurophysiology

The Musician and His
Surroundings

The True Organs of
Finding Truth in Music

 

 

Astronomy of Mind EQ x IQ

Hall of Harmony

International Experts

Educational Program
Health

Scientific Research

International Media

International Congresses

Membership

Application to the Academy

 

 






UNIVERSAL MUSIC THEORY 2
The Practical Fundamentals of Universal Cognition
.
 
PART   XI
     
 
INDIRECT AND DIRECT GAINING KNOWLEDGE IN MUSIC
     
         
 
The Organs of Cognition in the Process of Gaining Knowledge in Music


   
 
Once the lis­tener knows the natu­ral mu­si­cal ex­peri­ence of a mu­sic crea­tor, then it is his de­sire to sta­bi­lize this world of ex­peri­ence within him­self, too.

 
The Music Listener Aspires to Creative Stability
 
 
Only af­ter hav­ing adopted this in­ner art of self-knowl­edge, learn­ing the outer craft of mu­sic makes sense to him.
Then he can as­sume the re­spon­si­bil­ity to in­spire oth­ers for higher knowl­edge, in­deed, for the su­preme self-cog­ni­tion with which he has now be­come fa­mil­iar him­self.

 
The Music Lover Becomes a Teacher of Man
 
 
Mu­sic knows the in­di­rect as well as the di­rect way of gain­ing knowl­edge.
Re­lat­ing both to our tools of cog­ni­tion, we find very dif­fer­ent cir­cum­stances re­sult­ing from the in­di­rectness or the di­rectness of our gain­ing knowl­edge.

 
The Inner Field of Gaining Knowledge in Music
 
 
Our outer ear, for ex­ample, per­ceives the tone di­rectly in the acous­tic space and trans­mits the in­for­ma­tion of the tone struc­ture to our mind. The mind cre­ates a re­flec­tion of this tone, and our in­ner sense of hear­ing per­ceives this re­flec­tion of tone.
While our outer ear per­ceives the tone in the acous­tic space di­rectly, our in­ner ear rec­og­nizes this tone only in­di­rectly through its replica in our mind.

 
The Outer and the Inner Musical Hearing
 
 
Our in­ner or­gan of hear­ing conveys the in­for­ma­tion of the sound to our in­tel­lect, and our un­der­stand­ing infers the pa­rame­ters which de­ter­mine the tone struc­ture – for ex­ample, the pitch, the pro­por­tion of the over­tones, the volume and with it the volume of the in­di­vid­ual over­tones, the du­ra­tion of the in­di­vid­ual over­tones, and so on.

 
The Path of Information from the Musical Sound-Space to the Finer Tools of Cognition
 
 
From our in­ner sense of hear­ing our feel­ing gathers the in­for­ma­tion as to the de­gree of den­sity of the in­for­ma­tion, and of the warmth that is pre­sent in the sound­ing event – and thus, also of the malleabil­ity of the sound.

 
The Inner Musical Understanding
 
 
Our un­der­stand­ing and our feel­ing evalu­ate the in­for­ma­tion on the sound qual­ity which flows to them from our sense of hear­ing, and these tools of cog­ni­tion, too, re­ceive this knowl­edge about the sound only in­di­rectly – in the fourth de­gree, while the in­ner sense of hear­ing still re­ceived a third-de­gree in­for­ma­tion from the mind.
(Our outer or­gan of hear­ing, our ear, gath­ered a first-de­gree in­for­ma­tion of the sound from the acous­tic space; our mind gath­ered a sec­ond-de­gree sound-in­for­ma­tion from the neu­ro­physi­ol­ogy of the ear; our in­ner sense of hear­ing gath­ered a third-de­gree sound-in­for­ma­tion from our mind, and now our feel­ing and un­der­stand­ing gather from our in­ner sense of hear­ing a fourth-de­gree in­for­ma­tion.)

 
The Tools of Cognition Filtering the Musical Information
 
 
Our in­tel­lect hands over to our self-con­scious­ness the in­for­ma­tion that flows to it through feel­ing and un­der­stand­ing along with the re­sults of its ex­ami­na­tions.
At eve­ry step of this flow of in­for­ma­tion through our tools of cog­ni­tion, through our in­tel­lect – through our mind, through our in­ner sense of hear­ing, and through feel­ing and un­der­stand­ing – to our self-aware­ness, the in­for­ma­tion about the tone is sub­jected to change, or to a fil­ter­ing.

 
The Natural Limit of the Organ of Hearing
 
 
Our outer or­gan of hear­ing draws from the sound, that reverberates in the acous­tic space, only as much in­for­ma­tion as it is ca­pa­ble of per­ceiv­ing, and here the thresh­old of hear­ing rep­re­sents its natu­ral limit.

   
 
Our mind, in turn, rep­re­sents only as much of the acous­tic event as it is ca­pa­ble of rep­re­sent­ing, and the accuracy of its rep­re­sen­ta­tion de­pends on the op­era­tional qual­ity of the neu­ro­physi­ol­ogy – i.e. on the de­gree of our neu­ro­physi­ologi­cal in­te­gra­tion.

 
Quality of Function of the Neurophysiology
 
 
If the sound, which reverberates in the acous­tic space and which is trans­mit­ted via our outer or­gan of hear­ing to our mind, is very com­plex, and if its pa­rame­ters change in a very subtle man­ner, then it may well happen that our mind does not pro­duce a replica of a sound equally subtly struc­tured, be­cause our neu­ro­physi­ol­ogy can­not trans­mit to our mind fast enough all the mani­fold ele­ments of the tonal struc­tural change as it evolves.

 
Transfer Losses Due to Complexity
 
 
In such a case, only a quasi simi­lar tone is gen­er­ated in our mind, a sound with a simplified pat­tern, which has aban­doned many in­di­vid­ual com­po­nents of the sound – fine nuances of its shape.
Thus, the sound which reverberates in all its di­ver­sity in the acous­tic space, does not really reach our mind.

   
     
     
                                 
     
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
                                     
                                     
             
                                     
                                     
                                     
.